AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FEIGENBAUM, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by WEISS, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FEIGENBAUM, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by WEISS, H. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by FEIGENBAUM, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by WEISS, H. S.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 11, 312-316, Copyright © 1962 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Effect of "Meal Eating" Versus "Nibbling" on Body Composition and Digestive Organ Weight of Normal and Cropectomized Chickens

A. S. FEIGENBAUM PH.D.1, HANS FISHER PH.D.1, and H. S. WEISS PH.D.1

1 From the Nutrition and Physiology Laboratories, Rutgers, The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey

The crop was surgically removed from one week old chickens. The effects of meal eating (two one-hour feeding periods per day) versus nibbling (food available continuously) was then studied in cropectomized and normal birds. In one experiment, birds remained on their particular feeding schedule until they attained a given body weight. In a second experiment, food intake was equalized among all four groups with two groups consuming it in two one-hour periods, the other two throughout the day.

Meal eating significantly increased the weight of the esophagus and gizzard plus the proventriculus. Body fat was significantly reduced and body water increased on meal eating. Protein content of carcass remained unaltered. Crop removal in the chicken greatly exaggerated the effects of meal eating. The effects of meal eating versus nibbling on body composition are the reverse of those observed in the rat.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1962 by The American Society for Nutrition