AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LONGENECKER, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by SARETT, H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LONGENECKER, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by SARETT, H. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by LONGENECKER, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by SARETT, H. P.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 13, 291-296, Copyright © 1963 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Nutritional Quality of Survival Biscuits and Crackers

JOHN B. LONGENECKER PH.D.1 and HERBERT P. SARETT PH.D.1

1 From the Department of Nutritional Research, Mead Johnson Research Center, Evansville, Indiana

Studies have been conducted in rats to evaluate the nutritional quality of the "Survival Biscuits and Crackers" being stockpiled by the Office of Civil Defense. Male weanling rats lost about 20 per cent and young adult rats about 12 per cent of their initial body weight when fed these survival rations for four weeks as the sole diet or when supplied with additional vitamins and minerals.

Control diets supplying the same level of protein (8 per cent of the calories) as in the survival rations supported satisfactory weight gains in both weanling and young adult rats.

The lysine content of the Survival Biscuits and Crackers was very low, presumably due to losses in baking, and supplied only 1 gm. per 100 gm. protein, or a third of that calculated for the original ingredients. Adding lysine to the rations permitted moderate weight gains and gave protein efficiencies approximating those to be expected for the original ingredients. Thus, the unexpectedly poor quality of the survival rations is primarily due to their low lysine content.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1963 by The American Society for Nutrition