AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOLLISTER, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by OVERALL, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HOLLISTER, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by OVERALL, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by HOLLISTER, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by OVERALL, J. E.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 15, 149-157, Copyright © 1964 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Sources of Variation in Repeated Measurement of Plasma Free Fatty Acids in Rested Fasting Subjects

LEO E. HOLLISTER M.D.1 and JOHN E. OVERALL PH.D.1

1 From the Veterans Administration Hospital, Palo Alto, California, and the Research Computational Center, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas

Plasma free fatty acids (FFA) were measured repetitively in different samples of rested, fasting subjects during six separate clinical studies. Statistical analysis of the sources of variance in these repeated measurements of FFA revealed the greatest contribution to be from intraindividual variation. Mean variance from this source averaged 62.5 per cent for the series of six studies, ranging between 39.7 and 75.9 per cent in individual studies. The remainder of the variance was attributable to differences between subjects; variance due to technical error was minimal. Mean coefficients of variation ranged between 18.6 per cent and 29.3 per cent, the usual trend being toward a reduction in variation with a decreased interval between measurements. Nonetheless, variation was high even when samples were taken at an interval of 1 hour (18.6 per cent) or under identical basal conditions 24 hours apart (23.9 per cent). This high degree of intraindividual variation of FFA levels must be considered in clinical studies using this measure, as many of the factors which affect FFA levels are beyond ordinary experimental control.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1964 by The American Society for Nutrition