AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'SULLIVAN, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by MAHAN, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'SULLIVAN, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by MAHAN, C. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by O'SULLIVAN, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by MAHAN, C. M.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 19, 345-351, Copyright © 1966 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Glucose Tolerance Test

Variability in Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women

JOHN B. O'SULLIVAN M.D.1 and CLARE M. MAHAN 1

1 From the Fifth and Sixth (Boston University) Medical Services, Boston City Hospital, and the Diabetes and Arthritis Field Research Section, U. S. Public Health Service, Boston, Massachusetts

The sources of variation in blood sugar measurements were examined in a group of fifty-three nonpregnant and fifty-two pregnant women who had repeated glucose tolerance tests.

Under standardized conditions, the blood sugar variation within the individual subject was estimated to be contributing, in general, over 50 per cent of the total variability both in the fasting state and following the oral ingestion of glucose. This is discussed in relation to the clinical observation that the range of blood sugars of fifty-three different women is greater than the range found within an individual.

Fasting blood sugars were less variable in pregnant than in nonpregnant women. Postglucose values were more variable, the pregnant women accounting for an estimated 60 to 68 per cent as compared with the 46 to 55 per cent of the total variability in the non-pregnant women.

This variability was reduced by summing the three postglucose values. Reducing the time interval between tests does not reduce the variability within a subject which is seen on retesting unless such repeat tests are carried out within quarter hour intervals.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H.-G. Muller, I. Abramson, and R. Azari
Nonparametric regression to the mean
PNAS, August 19, 2003; 100(17): 9715 - 9720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by The American Society for Nutrition