|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 21, 553-564, Copyright © 1968 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.
1 From the Medical and Research Service, Veterans Administration Center, Los Angeles, California, and Department of Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
A controlled comparison was made between 17 patients prescribed a high caloric 20-g protein diet (G) of high biological value and 15 patients fed a more conventional isocaloric 40-g mixed protein diet (P). Although the degree of azotemia decreased significantly only with the G diet, symptomatic and biochemical improvement was similar in both groups. Weight decreased more frequently and bleeding time increased significantly with the G diet. Plasma pH, creatinine clearances, hematocrits, and nerve conduction velocities deteriorated significantly with both diets. Conformity with the diet was evaluated by dietary interviews and analyses of home-prepared diets. While P patients usually adhered to the diet, only 1/17 G patients followed the diet closely for more than a few weeks. Most remained within 30 g of protein; others deviated more. Even those taking greater than 30 g of protein complained; dissatisfaction and overt hostility were common. Enhanced patient acceptance, greater eating pleasure, and similar symptomatic improvement occurred with the more liberal protein intake.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Cianciaruso, A. Pota, A. Pisani, S. Torraca, R. Annecchini, P. Lombardi, A. Capuano, P. Nazzaro, V. Bellizzi, and M. Sabbatini Metabolic effects of two low protein diets in chronic kidney disease stage 4-5--a randomized controlled trial Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 636 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |