AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHAMPAKAM, S.
Right arrow Articles by GOPALAN, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CHAMPAKAM, S.
Right arrow Articles by GOPALAN, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by CHAMPAKAM, S.
Right arrow Articles by GOPALAN, C.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 21, 844-852, Copyright © 1968 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Kwashiorkor and Mental Development

S. CHAMPAKAM M.A., B.T.1, S. G. SRIKANTIA M.B., B.S., D.SC.1, and C. GOPALAN M.D., PH.D.1

1 From Nutrition Research Laboratories, Indian Council of Medical Research, Tarnaka, Hyderabad-7, India

Nineteen children successfully treated for kwashiorkor were followed up to see the effect of early malnutrition on growth and mental functions. These children were compared with appropriately matched controls selected from the same locality and the school from which the experimental children were derived. These controls were matched for age, sex, religion, caste, socioeconomic status, family size, birth order, and educational level of the parents and the subjects.

Suitable intelligence tests and sensory development tests were constructed and these tests were applied to both the experimental and control groups of children. In addition to these tests, anthropometric measurements were also taken on all children. The salient features of the study are:

a) There was a significant difference between the performance of the control and the experimental subjects with regard to the intelligence tests. This difference was particularly marked in the younger age group (8-9 years) and tended to diminish in the older age group (10-11 years).

b) Intersensory organization was poorer in the experimental subjects than in the control subjects. The performance in the intersensory tests was markedly poorer in the younger age group and tended to improve in the older age group (10-11 years).

c) The retardation was noticeable mainly with regard to perceptual and abstract abilities.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by The American Society for Nutrition