AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHEPHARD, R. J
Right arrow Articles by OLBRECHT, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SHEPHARD, R. J
Right arrow Articles by OLBRECHT, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by SHEPHARD, R. J
Right arrow Articles by OLBRECHT, A. J.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 22, 1175-1189, Copyright © 1969 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Factors Affecting Body Density and Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat

Data on 518 Canadian City Dwellers

R. J SHEPHARD 1, G. JONES 1, K. ISHII 1, M. KANEKO 1, and A. J. OLBRECHT 1

1 From the Departments of Physiological Hygiene and Epidemiology and Biometrics School of Hygiene, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Factors affecting body density and skin-fold measurements are analyzed in a population of 518 Canadian city dwellers. The distribution of skin-fold measurements shows significant skewing and kurtosis in children and young adults but not in older members of the population; presumably, at this stage all have some obesity. In our adult subjects, there seems neither theoretical nor experimental justification for logarithmic transformation of the data. The first component of a principal component analysis accounts for 59-74% of the variance of data at different ages. Six skin folds (subscapular, chest, waist, abdomen, triceps, and suprailiac) are uniformly represented in this component, which seems a general expression of subcutaneous fat. Two other folds (chin and knee) behave atypically. In children, the best prediction of body density is obtained from the sum of the three folds recommended for the IBP (triceps, subscapular, and suprailiac); however, caution should be exercised in endorsing the triceps measurement since this fails to increase with age, and the reported results vary widely between different laboratories. Some 72% of the variance in skin-fold measurements can be described by a multiple regression based on weight, height, and height2. Other factors having a significant influence on skin-fold thickness include age, alcohol consumption, attitude to sport, and sleeping habits.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by The American Society for Nutrition