AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CONN, H. O.
Right arrow Articles by FLOCH, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CONN, H. O.
Right arrow Articles by FLOCH, M. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by CONN, H. O.
Right arrow Articles by FLOCH, M. H.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 23, 1588-1594, Copyright © 1970 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Effects of Lactulose and Lactobacillus acidophilus on the Fecal Flora

HAROLD O. CONN M.D.1 and MARTIN H. FLOCH M.S., M.D.1

1 From the Departments of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut and the Veterans Administration Hospital, West Haven, Connecticut

Portal—systemic encephalopathy (PSE) is generally considered to be a consequence of bacterial enzymatic activity on nitrogenous substrates in the intestinal tract. The introduction of lactulose and of Lactobacillus acidophilus therapy was based on the assumption that replacement of proteolytic bacteria by fermentative organisms would improve PSE. Previous studies have shown that the fecal flora in cirrhotic patients with PSE is qualitatively and quantitatively similar to that of normal subjects and cirrhotic patients without PSE. The present studies demonstrate that lactulose did not significantly affect the fecal floral pattern in either normal subjects or cirrhotic patients. Furthermore, changes in the total number of lactobacilli in individual patients did not correlate with results of therapy. Similarly, there were no significant changes in the stool pattern after L. acidophilus therapy, except for a decrease in total anaerobic bacteria, and no apparent correlation with the clinical response.

The lack of change may indicate that current cultural methods are too insensitive to detect physiologically important alterations, that the fecal floral pattern does not accurately reflect the intestinal pattern, or that the quantitative stool bacterial pattern is not critical in the pathogenesis of PSE.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 by The American Society for Nutrition