AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frisancho, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Garn, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frisancho, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Garn, S. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Frisancho, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Garn, S. M.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 24, 541-546, Copyright © 1971 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Skin-fold thickness and muscle size: implications for developmental status and nutritional evaluation of children from Honduras

A. Roberto Frisancho Ph.D.1 and Stanley M. Garn Ph.D.1

1 From the Center for Human Growth and Development, and the Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104

The relationships between triceps skin fold and stature, and between upper arm muscle diameter and stature were studied in a cross-sectional sample of 647 age-matched pairs of Honduran rural children, aged 0 to 20 years. The results of the present study suggest that, within the range of subcutaneous fat observed in these children, only those with triceps skin folds above the 95th percentile and those below the 5th percentile differ markedly in stature, thereby suggesting that the relationship between fatness and growth is not linear. On the other hand, children with upper arm muscle diameter above the 85th percentile are systematically taller than their counterparts with upper arm muscle diameter below the 15th percentile. The implications of these findings are that measurements of muscularity of children in underdeveloped countries can be used as a general index of nutritional status, whereas measures of skin folds may serve as indicators of nutritional status only at the extremes of leanness and fatness. Furthermore, the demonstrated value of the arm circumference in the assessment of nutritional status (30) may, in undernourished populations, lie more in the muscular contribution than in the combination of fat and muscle







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by The American Society for Nutrition