AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Björn-Rasmussen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Björn-Rasmussen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, R. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Björn-Rasmussen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, R. B.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 25, 317-323, Copyright © 1972 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Food iron absorption in man. I. Isotopic exchange between food iron and inorganic iron salt added to food: studies on maize, wheat, and eggs

Erik Björn-Rasmussen M.D.1, Leif Hallberg M.D.1, and Richard B. Walker 1

1 From the Department of Medicine II, University of Goteborg, Sahlgrenska Sjukhuset, Goteborg SV, Sweden, and the Department of Botany, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

The present study was a first step in testing the hypothesis that food iron can be regarded as a two-pool system (heme and non-heme) with respect to absorption. Biologically, radioiron-labeled foods (maize, wheat, and eggs) were mixed with an inorganic different radioiron tracer during preparation of the food. The absorption of the two tracers was almost identical in each of the foods studied. This was valid in spite of a great individual variation in absorption both within and between groups, indicating that there was a complete isotopic exchange between the biological label and the added tracer.

The absorption of iron from the three foods differed markedly, which may be due not only to different chemical forms of the non-heme iron compounds in the foods but also to the presence of other compounds favoring or inhibiting iron absorption.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
T. Walter, F. Pizarro, E. Boy, and S. A. Abrams
The Poor Bioavailability of Elemental Iron in Corn Masa Flour Is Not Affected by Disodium EDTA
J. Nutr., February 1, 2004; 134(2): 380 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. R. Lynch and R. J. Stoltzfus
Iron and Ascorbic Acid: Proposed Fortification Levels and Recommended Iron Compounds
J. Nutr., September 1, 2003; 133(9): 2978S - 2984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
B. Teucher and S. J Fairweather-Tait
Comment on the use of the term intrinsic labeling
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2001; 73(1): 128 - 129.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
W. P. Goddard, K. Coupland, J. A. Smith, and R. G. Long
Iron Uptake by Isolated Human Enterocyte Suspensions in Vitro is Dependent on Body Iron Stores and Inhibited by Other Metal Cations
J. Nutr., January 1, 1997; 127(1): 177 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by The American Society for Nutrition