AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galloway, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Chenoweth, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Galloway, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Chenoweth, W. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Galloway, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Chenoweth, W. L.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 26, 939-951, Copyright © 1973 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Utilization of nutrients in milk- and wheat-based diets by men with adequate and reduced abilities to absorb lactose. I. Energy and nitrogen

Doris Howes Galloway Ph.D.1 and Wanda L. Chenoweth Ph.D.1

1 From the Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

Four healthy men with proved reduced ability to absorb lactose (LM) and two control subjects were fed diets based exclusively on milk or wheat proteins for four successive 12-day periods. Milk protein diets contained 48 g lactose from milk, approximately one-half that amount from lactose-reduced milk, or no lactose (simulated milk). The fourth diet was comprised of milk-free wheaten foods and contained no lactose. Protein and energy intakes were held to minimally adequate levels to test the hypothesis that ingestion of lactose leads to nutritionally significant fecal losses of nutrients in cases of diminished lactose absorption. Two LM subjects showed no evidence of malabsorption when the diet contained 48 g of lactose in four divided doses, given with meals. The other two LM subjects had elevated levels of hydrogen in the breath and increased fecal losses of moisture, dry solids, and energy that were lactose dose dependent. These parameters and fecal fat and nitrogen excretion were markedly increased with the wheat diet in all cases, irrespective of lactose absorption status. In LM subjects, fecal losses with wheat were greater than or equal to losses sustained with 48 g lactose in the diet. Five men maintained body weight equally well or poorly throughout a range of metabolizable energy intakes given in each case; energy intake and body weight change were significantly related only in one subject. Nitrogen (N) balance with milk diets was significantly related to metabolizable energy intake in four subjects. After this was taken into account, there were no significant differences in N balance among the milk treatments. At milk N intakes of 94 mg/kg, energy intake determined the sign and magnitude of the N balance irrespective of the ability to absorb lactose except as this resulted in decreased energy availability. The maximum difference in fecal energy loss among milk treatments, for the two poorest absorbers at the highest lactose dosage, was equal to 1.6 to 1.7 kcal/kg or 4% of intake. N balance was distinctly poorer with the wheat diet; true N equilibrium was not achieved in any subject with 98 mg/kg wheat N in the diet.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by The American Society for Nutrition