AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleagle, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hegsted, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleagle, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hegsted, D. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fleagle, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hegsted, D. M.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 28, 246-253, Copyright © 1975 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Physical growth of cebus monkeys, Cebus albifrons, during protein or calorie deficiency

JG Fleagle, KW Samonds and DM Hegsted

Infant cebus monkey (Cebus albifrons) on experimental diets providing low-protein (2.8% of calories) or low-calorie (67% of ad libitum intake) levels for 20 weeks beginning at 8 weeks of age showed marked changes in their patterns of physical growth. Significant size differences between the malnourished animals and the control group appeared within 4 weeks. Although rates of growth were significantly reduced in all measurements, all of the malnourished monkeys, including low-protein animals showing zero weight gain, continued skeletal growth (except in skull measurements) at low levels for the duration of experiment. Both the protein- and calorie-restricted animals developed a thin, emaciated appearance often associated with marasmus, not by the continuous loss of tissue byt by the redistribution of the tissue over a slowly expanding skeleton. For many skeletal proportions, the pattern and shape development in the malnourished animals differed from that of the control animals. Growth during malnutrition was most affected in those parts of the skeleton which were more advanced in relative size.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. R. Gale, C. N. Martyn, S. Kellingray, R. Eastell, and C. Cooper
Intrauterine Programming of Adult Body Composition
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2001; 86(1): 267 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. P. Miller and R. Z. German
Protein Malnutrition Affects the Growth Trajectories of the Craniofacial Skeleton in Rats
J. Nutr., November 1, 1999; 129(11): 2061 - 2069.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by The American Society for Nutrition