AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Connell, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Connell, A. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Connell, A. M.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 29, 1427-1431, Copyright © 1976 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Natural fiber and bowel dysfunction

AM Connell

This paper reviews the current status of knowledge with relation to the effects of natural fiber on intestinal physiology. The one clear feature that emerges from literature is that most types of natural fiber increase the bulk of the stool. It is probable also that transit time is affected. Transit time appears to be decreased in persons with initially a slow time when they use certain forms of natural fiber and it may be that persons with rapid transit have a decrease in the rate of passage as fiber is added to the diet. Data on colonic intraluminal pressures are scanty, but those that exist seem to indicate that the addition of bran to the diet results in a decrease in overall colonic pressures. Much has been written and speculated about the role of natural fiber in the prevention or therapy of irritable colon and diverticular disease. Clinical studies, while enthusiastic, are preliminary and there are no hard data to indicate that the use of these materials are, in fact, helpful. Such clinical trials that have been published are, in general, small, poorly controlled and overall equivocal in their conclusions. A great deal of further work requires to be done to justify the claims that have been made on the role of fiber in altering normal or abnormal bowel habit.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by The American Society for Nutrition