AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jones, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, G.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 29, 633-638, Copyright © 1976 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Symptom response to lactose-reduced milk in lactose-intolerant adults

DV Jones, MC Latham, FV Kosikowski and G Woodward

The possible usefulness of low-lactose milk for those lactose- intolerant subjects who develop symptoms from milk consumption was investigated. In the first part of the study, 16 intolerant subjects (blood glucose rise less than 25 mg/100 ml) received low-lactose skim milk containing 15 g lactose (2.5 cups) and 7.5 g lactose (2.5 cups), regular skim milk containing 30 g lactose (2.5 cups), and all three milks plus a small breakfast. The low lactose milks produced significantly fewer symptoms. The food given with the milk had no significant effect on symptomatic response. The second group of 17 subjects received 25 g lactose in water (250 ml), skim milk (500 ml) and whole milk (500 ml); 10 g lactose in lactose-reduced skim (500 ml) and whole milk (500 ml) and whole milk (500 ml); and a placebo (250 ml). There was a significant positive relationship between amount of lactose consumed and symptom response. The form in which the lactose was administered (e.g., whole versus skim milk) was not significantly related to symptoms. It is concluded that in a symptomatic subjects a significantly greater quantity of low-lactose milk than regular milks can be consumed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
T. H. Vesa, P. Marteau, and R. Korpela
Lactose Intolerance
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2000; 19(90002): 165S - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
A. Carroccio, G. Montalto, G. Cavera, A. Notarbatolo, and the Lactase Deficiency Study Group
Lactose Intolerance and Self-Reported Milk Intolerance: Relationship with Lactose Maldigestion and Nutrient Intake
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., December 1, 1998; 17(6): 631 - 636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
T. H. Vesa, P. R. Marteau, F. B. Briet, M.-C. Boutron-Ruault, and J.-C. Rambaud
Raising Milk Energy Content Retards Gastric Emptying of Lactose in Lactose-Intolerant Humans with Little Effect on Lactose Digestion
J. Nutr., December 1, 1997; 127(12): 2316 - 2320.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by The American Society for Nutrition