AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fomon, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fomon, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, B. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fomon, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, B. B.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 32, 2460-2471, Copyright © 1979 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Methionine fortification of a soy protein formula fed to infants

SJ Fomon, EE Ziegler, LJ Filer Jr, SE Nelson and BB Edwards

Data from study of nine normal full-term infants fed a soy isolate- based formula unsupplemented with methionine were compared with similar data from study of 10 similar infants fed the same formula supplemented with L-methionine and with data from previous studies of larger groups of infants receiving various other feedings. Food intake, growth, and serum chemical values were studied from 8 through 111 days of age. In addition, nitrogen balance studies were carried out. Statistically significant differences were as follows: lesser weight gain per 100 kcal by infants fed the unsupplemented soy isolate-based formula than by infants fed milk-based or other soy isolate-based formulas; lesser serum concentrations of albumin at age 28 days by infants fed the unsupplemented soy isolate-based formula than by breast-fed infants; greater serum concentrations of urea nitrogen by infants receiving the unsupplemented soy isolate-based formula than by those receiving the same formula supplemented with L-methionine. A number of other differences was noted but were not statistically significant. The results suggest that normal infants fed a formula providing 2.25 /100 kcal of a soy protein isolate not fortified with methionine performed less well during the first 6 weeks of life than did breast-fed infants and infants fed milk-based formulas or other soy isolate-based formulas fortified with methionine. The limiting nutrient appears to have been methionine.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
P. J. Garlick
Toxicity of Methionine in Humans
J. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 136(6): 1722S - 1725S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
M. A. Mendez, M. S. Anthony, and L. Arab
Soy-Based Formulae and Infant Growth and Development: A Review
J. Nutr., August 1, 2002; 132(8): 2127 - 2130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
Committee on Nutrition
Soy Protein-based Formulas: Recommendations for Use in Infant Feeding
Pediatrics, January 1, 1998; 101(1): 148 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
J. E. Ryu, E. E. Ziegler, S. E. Nelson, and S. J. Fomon
Dietary Intake of Lead and Blood Lead Concentration in Early Infancy
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 1983; 137(9): 886 - 891.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by The American Society for Nutrition