AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trowbridge, F. L.
Right arrow Articles by Staehling, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trowbridge, F. L.
Right arrow Articles by Staehling, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Trowbridge, F. L.
Right arrow Articles by Staehling, N.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 33, 687-696, Copyright © 1980 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Sensitivity and specificity of arm circumference indicators in identifying malnourished children

FL Trowbridge and N Staehling

Arm circumference indicators of nutritional status such as simple arm circumference, arm circumference-for-age and arm circumference-for- height have advantages for field use because of their simplicity and low cost. However, these indicators need to be evaluated in terms of their ability to identify children who are manourished by more accepted criteria such as weight-for-age and weight-for-height. This study used sensitivity-specificity analysis to evaluate arm circumference indicators in 3838 children 1 to 4 years of age in a rural area of El Salvador. It was found that simple arm circumference gave sensitivity- specificity results similar to arm circumference-for-age and generally better than arm circumference-for-height in identifying children with low weight-for-age. The three arm circumference indicators gave similar sensitivity-specificity results in identifying children with low weight- for-height. Linear correlations of the arm circumference indicators with weight-for-age and weight-for-height gave results which correspond to the results of sensitivity-specificity analysis, but the information obtained from correlations to was less useful in evaluating the adequacy of the individual arm circumference indicators for screening purposes. Sensitivity-specificity analysis is proposed as useful method for evaluating indicators for use in nutritional surveys and for screening for malnutrition.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asia Pac J Public HealthHome page
S. Masud Ahmed
Differing Health and Health-Seeking Behaviour: Ethnic Minorities of the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh
Asia Pac J Public Health, January 1, 2001; 13(2): 100 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of HealthHome page
O. Ojo, R. Deane, and P. Amuna
The use of anthropometric and clinical parameters for early identification and categorisation of nutritional risk in pre-school children in Benin City, Nigeria
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, December 1, 2000; 120(4): 230 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J.-P. Habicht
Comparing the quality of indicators of nutritional status by receiver operating characteristic analysis or by standardized differences
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2000; 71(3): 672 - 673.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by The American Society for Nutrition