AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Vaswani, A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Vaswani, A. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cohn, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Vaswani, A. N.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 34, 2839-2847, Copyright © 1981 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Comparison of methods of estimating body fat in normal subjects and cancer patients

SH Cohn, KJ Ellis, D Vartsky, A Sawitsky, W Gartenhaus, S Yasumura and AN Vaswani

Total body fat can be indirectly estimated by the following noninvasive techniques: determination of lean body mass by measurement of body potassium or body water, and determination of density by underwater weighing or by skinfold measurements. The measurement of total body nitrogen by neutron activation provides another technique for estimating lean body mass and hence body fat. The nitrogen measurement can also be combined with the measurement of total body potassium in a two compartment model of the lean body mass from which another estimate of body fat can be derived. All of the above techniques are subject to various errors and are based on a number of assumptions, some of which are incompletely validated. These techniques were applied to a population of normal subjects and to a group of cancer patients. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed in terms of their ability to estimate total body fat.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
T. L. Leavens, B. C. Blount, D. M. DeMarini, M. C. Madden, J. L. Valentine, M. W. Case, L. K. Silva, S. H. Warren, N. M. Hanley, and R. A. Pegram
Disposition of Bromodichloromethane in Humans Following Oral and Dermal Exposure
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2007; 99(2): 432 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. Muscaritoli, G. Grieco, S. Capria, A. Paola Iori, and F. Rossi Fanelli
Nutritional and metabolic support in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2002; 75(2): 183 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by The American Society for Nutrition