AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owen, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Owen, G. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Owen, G. M.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 35, 629-638, Copyright © 1982 by The American Society for Nutrition

Measurement, recording, and assessment of skinfold thickness in childhood and adolescence: report of a small meeting

George M. Owen M.D.1

1 Bristol-Myers Company International Division, Room 18-74, 345 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10154

The National Center for Health Statistics pooled skinfold thickness measurements of some 20,000 children age 1 to 17 yr in the United States and developed smoothed percentiles to serve as reference data. In this report, the populations represented in these percentiles and the techniques used in merging sets of data collected over time (1963 to 1974) in these populations are described. It is emphasized that the percentiles describe the skinfold thicknesses of American children and adolescents and should not be considered "norms" or "standards." Techniques for measuring skinfold thickness in the clinical setting are outlined so that measurements obtained are comparable to those represented in the percentiles. It is considered inappropriate to conclude that a skinfold thickness above or below some arbitrary percentile is unacceptable because available information is inadequate to define risks of relative fatness. Finally, it is suggested that skinfold thickness should probably not be used as a routine screening measurement in well-child care.

Key Words: Skinfold thickness • children • smoothed percentiles

Submitted on June 5, 1981
Accepted on September 2, 1981




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
T. Löppönen, A.-L. Saukkonen, W. Serlo, P. Tapanainen, A. Ruokonen, and M. Knip
Reduced levels of growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-I and binding protein-3 in patients with shunted hydrocephalus
Arch. Dis. Child., July 1, 1997; 77(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of HealthHome page
A.R.P. Walker, B.F. Walker, J. Jones, and M. Kadwa
Growth of South African Indian Schoolchildren in Different Social Classes
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, April 1, 1989; 109(2): 54 - 56.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by The American Society for Nutrition