|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 36, 573-575, Copyright © 1982 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS |
SM Garn and SD Pesick
As shown in 58,468 individuals, representing 10 different samples from four different surveys, the "Benn" index (weight/heightp) is highly correlated with other body mass measures that use weight and height, with values of r as high as 0.98 with weight alone. Comparing the Benn index and other body mass indices with four different skinfold measurements (triceps, subscapular, iliac, and abdominal) on 1933 males and 2136 females, correlations involving the Benn (weight/heightp) index were marginally superior to those with weight (by 0.09) and only fractionally superior to those with height/weight (by 0.04). Under the circumstances it is not evident that the population-specific exponent p in the Benn index conveys a material advantage in nutritional assessment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. B Heymsfield, D. Gallagher, L. Mayer, J. Beetsch, and A. Pietrobelli Scaling of human body composition to stature: new insights into body mass index Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2007; 86(1): 82 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Musani, N. D. Halbert, D. T. Redden, D. B. Allison, and J. N. Derr Marker Genotypes and Population Admixture and Their Association With Body Weight, Height and Relative Body Mass in United States Federal Bison Herds Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 775 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |