AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zlotkin, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zlotkin, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, G. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zlotkin, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, G. H.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 36, 862-867, Copyright © 1982 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Sulfur balances in intravenously fed infants: effects of cysteine supplementation

SH Zlotkin and GH Anderson

Sulfur balances were completed in newborn infants parenterally fed with or without cysteine. In both groups, the preservative, potassium metabisulfite, accounted for the majority of sulfur intake (32 mg S/kg/day), while methionine intakes provided an additional 27 sulfate losses accounted for approximately 95% of the sulfur excretion, with the remainder contained in amino acids. Balance data accounted for over 99% of the sulfur infused in the unsupplemented group, but only 90% of that given to the cysteine-supplemented group. Thus, urinary excretion of sulfate generally reflects input from either inorganic or amino acid sources. Of the sulfur retained in the supplemented group, 75% was calculated to be retained in lean tissue and in increases in total body sulfate, but the distribution of the remaining 25% remains unknown. The failure to account fully for the sulfate provided to the cysteine- supplemented group, however, may be due to errors in the balance technique or due to an accumulation of cysteine or sulfate in body pools undefined by this study.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. A. Riedijk, B. Stoll, S. Chacko, H. Schierbeek, A. L. Sunehag, J. B. van Goudoever, and D. G. Burrin
Methionine transmethylation and transsulfuration in the piglet gastrointestinal tract
PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3408 - 3413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. J. Hamadeh and L. J. Hoffer
Use of sulfate production as a measure of short-term sulfur amino acid catabolism in humans
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2001; 280(6): E857 - E866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by The American Society for Nutrition