AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krantzler, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Meiselman, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krantzler, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Meiselman, H. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Krantzler, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Meiselman, H. L.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 36, 1234-1242, Copyright © 1982 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Validity of telephoned diet recalls and records for assessment of individual food intake

NJ Krantzler, BJ Mullen, HG Schutz, LE Grivetti, CA Holden and HL Meiselman

Six methods of assessing individual food intake reported by telephone were compared for accuracy. A sample of 107 students eating in a dormitory dining hall was used. Two 7-day and four 3-day diet records were reported by telephone to either an interviewer or an answering device; and fourteen 6-h recalls and seven 24-h recalls were obtained by an interviewer over the telephone. To examine validity, the investigators observed respondents' intake for 28 days. Food item agreement scores comparing observed and reported data were calculated. Seven-day records were most accurate (87% food item agreement); 3-day records and 6-h recalls were equivalent (75%); and 24-h recalls were least accurate (69%). There were no significant difference in accuracy of reporting records to an interviewer versus a recording device, but respondents preferred the interviewer. Results of telephoned reporting compare favorably with personal interview techniques used by other investigators, indicating that telephoned methods should be further explored in community settings.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
J. M. de Castro
Varying Levels of Food Energy Self-Reporting Are Associated with Between-Group, but Not Within-Subject, Differences in Food Intake
J. Nutr., May 1, 2006; 136(5): 1382 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
J. M. de Castro
Dietary Energy Density Is Associated with Increased Intake in Free-Living Humans
J. Nutr., February 1, 2004; 134(2): 335 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
J. M. de Castro
The Time of Day of Food Intake Influences Overall Intake in Humans
J. Nutr., January 1, 2004; 134(1): 104 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. M Pearcey and J. M de Castro
Food intake and meal patterns of weight-stable and weight-gaining persons
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2002; 76(1): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
J. M. de Castro
Age-Related Changes in the Social, Psychological, and Temporal Influences on Food Intake in Free-Living, Healthy, Adult Humans
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2002; 57(6): M368 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
J. M. de Castro
Prior Day's Intake Has Macronutrient-Specific Delayed Negative Feedback Effects on the Spontaneous Food Intake of Free-Living Humans
J. Nutr., January 1, 1998; 128(1): 61 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by The American Society for Nutrition