AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gray, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gray, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, R. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gray, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, R. K.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 38, 122-128, Copyright © 1983 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Dietary intake and nutrient supplement use in a Southern California retirement community

GE Gray, A Paganini-Hill and RK Ross

Dietary histories and information concerning the use of nutritional supplements were obtained from 51 randomly selected residents of an Orange County, CA, retirement community. The nutrients for which dietary intakes were most apt to fall below 100% of the 1980 Recommended Dietary Allowance were: calcium, in both sexes; energy, in males; and iron, thiamin, riboflavin, and niacin in females. With the exception of calcium, few subjects had intakes below two-thirds of the Recommended Dietary Allowances. These findings are similar to those reported in previous dietary surveys of the elderly. Vitamin and mineral supplements were consumed by 72% of the subjects; such consumption was unrelated to dietary intake. Supplemental vitamin C was consumed by 67% of the subjects in amounts ranging from 30 to 5200 mg daily; supplemental vitamin E was taken by 51%, with amounts ranging from 8 to 1000 IU daily. Supplement use by this population is one of the highest reported among the elderly, an effect that may result from the affluence of the community, its geographic location, and from a high level of nutritional consciousness among its residents.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
M. Z. Vitolins, S. A. Quandt, L. D. Case, R. A. Bell, T. A. Arcury, and J. McDonald
Vitamin and Mineral Supplement Use by Older Rural Adults
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., October 1, 2000; 55(10): 613M - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by The American Society for Nutrition