AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goranzon, H.
Right arrow Articles by Thilen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goranzon, H.
Right arrow Articles by Thilen, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Goranzon, H.
Right arrow Articles by Thilen, M.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 38, 954-963, Copyright © 1983 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Calculation and determination of metabolizable energy in mixed diets to humans

H Goranzon, E Forsum and M Thilen

Several approaches are currently in use for calculating metabolizable energy of mixed diets from the foods and nutrients they contain. This study compares the metabolizable energy content of six low fiber and one high fiber diet as calculated by conventional procedures (ie, using Atwater's general factors, Merrill and Watts specific factors, and the British procedure where the monosaccharide equivalent of available carbohydrates is multiplied by 3.75 kcal/g) with values for metabolizable energy measured in balance experiments on human subjects. For the low fiber diets, the conventional procedures for calculation of metabolizable energy showed an average deviation between calculated and measured values of up to about 6% of the value obtained in balance experiments. For the high fiber diet Merrill and Watts specific factors and Atwater's general factors were superior to the British approach for calculation of metabolizable energy. Fecal energy content in relation to intake of undigestible energy is discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. C Buchholz and D. A Schoeller
Is a calorie a calorie?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2004; 79(5): 899S - 906S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. J. Kruskall, W. W. Campbell, and W. J. Evans
The Atwater Energy Equivalents Overestimate Metabolizable Energy Intake in Older Humans: Results from a 96-Day Strictly Controlled Feeding Study
J. Nutr., August 1, 2003; 133(8): 2581 - 2584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by The American Society for Nutrition