|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 38, 954-963, Copyright © 1983 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS |
H Goranzon, E Forsum and M Thilen
Several approaches are currently in use for calculating metabolizable energy of mixed diets from the foods and nutrients they contain. This study compares the metabolizable energy content of six low fiber and one high fiber diet as calculated by conventional procedures (ie, using Atwater's general factors, Merrill and Watts specific factors, and the British procedure where the monosaccharide equivalent of available carbohydrates is multiplied by 3.75 kcal/g) with values for metabolizable energy measured in balance experiments on human subjects. For the low fiber diets, the conventional procedures for calculation of metabolizable energy showed an average deviation between calculated and measured values of up to about 6% of the value obtained in balance experiments. For the high fiber diet Merrill and Watts specific factors and Atwater's general factors were superior to the British approach for calculation of metabolizable energy. Fecal energy content in relation to intake of undigestible energy is discussed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. C Buchholz and D. A Schoeller Is a calorie a calorie? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2004; 79(5): 899S - 906S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Kruskall, W. W. Campbell, and W. J. Evans The Atwater Energy Equivalents Overestimate Metabolizable Energy Intake in Older Humans: Results from a 96-Day Strictly Controlled Feeding Study J. Nutr., August 1, 2003; 133(8): 2581 - 2584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |