AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, R.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 40, 654-658, Copyright © 1984 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

A commentary on the Rationale of the Diet-Heart Statement of the American Heart Association

R Reiser

The objective of the Rationale of the Diet-Heart Statement of the American Heart Association was to restate the diet-heart recommendations of the American Heart Association and to quote the original publications on which they are based. Examination of those publications reveals that for the most part, they are obsolete or misquoted. The last section of the Rationale concerns the role of genetics and very briefly reviews the epidemiological and dietary intervention trial evidence. The latter discussion may be summarized as meaning that risk levels are in the 90 percentile group of plasma cholesterol levels and that those levels are due to genetic factors which "dietary changes alone cannot normalize." It admits that "all" dietary intervention trials "were flawed in one or another aspect of experimental design." Hope is expressed that the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial and the Lipid Research Clinics Primary Prevention Trial will support the diet-heart theory. The former did not and the latter was designed to test cholestyramine and not diet.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
F. Lifshitz and N. Moses
Growth Failure: A Complication of Dietary Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 1989; 143(5): 537 - 542.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. H. BECKER
The Cholesterol Saga: Whither Health Promotion?
Ann Intern Med, April 1, 1987; 106(4): 623 - 626.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by The American Society for Nutrition