AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennegard, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lundholm, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bennegard, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lundholm, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bennegard, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lundholm, K.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 40, 752-757, Copyright © 1984 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

A comparative study of the efficiency of intragastric and parenteral nutrition in man

K Bennegard, L Lindmark, I Wickstrom, T Schersten and K Lundholm

Solutions intended for parenteral nutrition were infused at constant rates intravenously and intragastrically in five healthy volunteers. Whole body utilization of nutrients was measured by indirect calorimetry and determination of nitrogen excretion in relation to circulating levels of substrates. Energy balance and urinary nitrogen excretion were the same in all subjects irrespective of whether nutrition was given intravenously or intragastrically. Minor differences in circulating levels of glucagon, alpha-amino nitrogen, and triglycerides were observed but had no impact on the energy and nitrogen metabolism. The results show that whole-body utilization of calories is the same with parenteral and enteral nutrition as evaluated over short time periods from the start of infusion. This is probably also true for amino acids.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
T. O. Lipman
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 1998; 22(3): 167 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
Y.-M. Yu, V. R. Young, R. G. Tompkins, and J. F. Burke
Comparative Evaluation of the Quantitative Utilization of Parenterally and Enterally Administered Leucine and L-[1-13C,15N]Leucine Within the Whole Body and the Splanchnic Region
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 1995; 19(3): 209 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
V. B. Grossie JR., K. Nishioka, T.-H. Chang, D. Patenia, M. M. Benitez, J. A. Ajani, and D. M. Ota
Differential Effects of Parenteral Nutrition on Tumor Growth and Erythrocyte Polyamine Levels in the Rat
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, November 1, 1989; 13(6): 590 - 595.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by The American Society for Nutrition