AJCN EB Program 2010 Early Registration
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Prather, E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Prather, E. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Prather, E. S.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 40, 1333-1337, Copyright © 1984 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Effect of making duplicate food collections on nutrient intakes calculated from diet records

WW Kim, W Mertz, JT Judd, MW Marshall, JL Kelsay and ES Prather

In a 1-yr study in which food intakes were recorded daily, subjects were asked to make duplicate food collections for 1 wk during each of the four seasons. Mean calculated energy intake of the 29 subjects was 12.9% less during the food collection periods than the mean for the entire year (which included collection periods). There were also significant reductions in the reported intake of all nutrients during the collection periods. Protein, vitamin A, saturated fat, and cholesterol intakes were decreased to the greatest extent. The actual decrease in energy intake was greater for the males than for the females, but the percentage was the same (12.9%). The younger group of subjects (less than or equal to 35) decreased energy intake 16.8% and the older group (greater than 35) 8.8%. Comparison of intakes during collection periods with intakes the week before and the week after showed that 28 of the 29 subjects decreased their energy intake from 1.1 to 32.3%. These data suggest that intakes of subjects during food collection periods do not represent their habitual levels of intake reported throughout the year.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
O.A. Levander
The Need for Measures of Selenium Status
International Journal of Toxicology, January 1, 1986; 5(1): 37 - 44.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by The American Society for Nutrition