AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valberg, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Valberg, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, M. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Valberg, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, M. J.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 41, 37-42, Copyright © 1985 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Does the oral zinc tolerance test measure zinc absorption?

LS Valberg, PR Flanagan, J Brennan and MJ Chamberlain

Increases in plasma zinc concentration were compared with radiozinc absorption after oral test doses. Ten healthy, fasting subjects were each given 385 mumol zinc chloride (25 mg Zn) labelled with 0.5 muCi 65ZnCl2 and a non-absorbed marker, 51CrCl3, dissolved in 100 ml of water; another 10 persons were given 354 mumol zinc chloride and 125 g of minced turkey containing 31 mumol zinc also labelled with 65Zn and 51Cr. Measurements were made of plasma zinc concentration at hourly intervals for 5 hours, radiozinc absorption by stool counting of unabsorbed radioactivity 12-36 hours later, and radiozinc retention by whole body counting at 7 days. The mean percentage of radiozinc absorbed and retained in the body from the two test meals was found to be identical (42%). In contrast the increased area under the plasma zinc curve up to 5 hours after the turkey meal, 28 +/- 9 mumol/L (mean +/- SD) was significantly less than that for zinc chloride alone, 47 +/- 15 mumol/L, p less than 0.005. Despite this difference, a good correlation was found between the area under the plasma zinc curve and 65Zn absorption in individual subjects after each meal. The discrepancy between the results of zinc absorption derived from the plasma zinc curve and 65Zn absorption for the liquid and solid test meals was most likely explained by binding of zinc to food and delayed gastric emptying of the solid meal. With a test meal of turkey meat at least this dampened the plasma appearance of zinc but did not affect its overall absorption.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. Hansen, S. Samman, L. T Madsen, M. Jensen, S. S Sorensen, and B. Sandstrom
Folic acid enrichment of bread does not appear to affect zinc absorption in young women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2001; 74(1): 125 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. R. Davis, R. J. McMahon, and R. J. Cousins
Metallothionein Knockout and Transgenic Mice Exhibit Altered Intestinal Processing of Zinc with Uniform Zinc-Dependent Zinc Transporter-1 Expression
J. Nutr., May 1, 1998; 128(5): 825 - 831.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by The American Society for Nutrition