AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wadden, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Day, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wadden, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Day, S. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wadden, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Day, S. C.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 41, 533-539, Copyright © 1985 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

A comparison of two very-low-calorie diets: protein-sparing-modified fast versus protein-formula-liquid diet

TA Wadden, AJ Stunkard, KD Brownell and SC Day

This study investigated the acceptability of two very-low-calorie diets in 16 moderately overweight persons participating in a weight reduction program. Subjects were prescribed a 1000-1200 kcal balanced diet the first month and asked to complete appetite and mood scales on a weekly basis. They were then randomly assigned to either a protein-sparing- modified fast (PSMF) or a protein-formula-liquid diet, each of which provided about 400 kcal daily. Analysis of the appetite data showed that PSMF subjects reported significantly less hunger and preoccupation with eating than did liquid diet subjects during 2 of the 4 weeks on a very-low-calorie diet. Subjects in both conditions reported significant reductions in anxiety. Results are discussed in terms of possible advantages of PSMF.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
P. Nguyen, H. Dumon, L. Martin, B. Siliart, L. Ferrier, B. Humbert, M. Diez, S. Breul, and V. Biourge
Weight Loss Does Not Influence Energy Expenditure or Leucine Metabolism in Obese Cats
J. Nutr., June 1, 2002; 132(6): 1649S - 1651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. Diez, P. Nguyen, I. Jeusette, C. Devois, L. Istasse, and V. Biourge
Weight Loss in Obese Dogs: Evaluation of a High-Protein, Low-Carbohydrate Diet
J. Nutr., June 1, 2002; 132(6): 1685S - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by The American Society for Nutrition