AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freedman-Akabas, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pi-Sunyer, F. X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freedman-Akabas, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pi-Sunyer, F. X.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Freedman-Akabas, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pi-Sunyer, F. X.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 41, 545-549, Copyright © 1985 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Lack of sustained increase in VO2 following exercise in fit and unfit subjects

S Freedman-Akabas, E Colt, HR Kissileff and FX Pi-Sunyer

Thermogenesis after exercise was studied by measuring oxygen consumption in 23 subjects who were classified into three groups according to their routine level of physical activity. VO2 was first measured after a 30-minute rest period 4-hours after breakfast. Then each subject either exercised for 20 minutes at approximately the anaerobic threshold or on a separate non-exercise day remained recumbent. The subject then returned to, or remained, at rest. There was no significant difference in VO2 from the resting level from 40 minutes to 3 hours after exercise, between exercise and non-exercise days in any fitness group. Seven subjects also exercised for a longer period or at a higher intensity. Again, there was no significant difference in the time course of VO2 from 40 minutes to 220 minutes after exercise, between exercise and non-exercise days. Because no sustained effect of moderate or intense exercise on VO2 was demonstrated, we conclude that no appreciable caloric loss beyond that generated by the exercise period itself and the early recovery phase is found in either fit or unfit subjects. These data do not support claims for sustained increases in metabolic rate after exercise in weight- control programs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. R. Short and D. A. Sedlock
Excess postexercise oxygen consumption and recovery rate in trained and untrained subjects
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 1997; 83(1): 153 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. Laforgia, R. T. Withers, N. J. Shipp, and C. J. Gore
Comparison of energy expenditure elevations after submaximal and supramaximal running
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 1997; 82(2): 661 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by The American Society for Nutrition