AJCN EB Program 2010 Early Registration
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scherf, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rubenfire, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scherf, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rubenfire, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Scherf, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rubenfire, M.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 43, 128-135, Copyright © 1986 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Validity of skinfold thickness measures of formerly obese adults

J Scherf, BA Franklin, CP Lucas, D Stevenson and M Rubenfire

To assess the validity of skinfold thickness estimates of body fatness in formerly morbid obese adults, 23 patients (17 women, 6 men) who had completed a protein-sparing modified fast were studied. Mean +/- SD weight loss was 60.7 +/- 20.6 kg for men and 42.6 +/- 11.5 kg for women. Body density and percent body fatness were determined after weight loss according to four commonly used skinfold equations: Pollock (P); Durnin-Rahaman (D-R); Durnin-Womersley (D-W); and, Jackson-Pollock (J-P). The validity of these measurements was assessed by hydrostatic weighing, which revealed a percent body fatness of 20.4 +/- 6.5 for men and 29.8 +/- 8.4 for women. The mean difference and total error (square root of the mean of squared deviations) between skinfold predicted and hydrostatically-determined percent body fatness for each skinfold equation were: P, 2.0 and 4.9; D-R, 4.2 and 6.6; D-W, 7.1 and 8.4; and, J-P, 0.7 and 4.4. With the exception of the latter equation, all significantly overestimated (p less than 0.01) hydrostatically- determined percent body fatness. Conclusion: Select skinfold equations may result in a marked overestimation of body fatness in formerly obese patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. E Friedl, K. A Westphal, L. J Marchitelli, J. F Patton, W C. Chumlea, and S. S Guo
Evaluation of anthropometric equations to assess body-composition changes in young women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2001; 73(2): 268 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by The American Society for Nutrition