AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNamara, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Slavin, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNamara, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Slavin, J. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McNamara, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Slavin, J. L.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 43, 898-902, Copyright © 1986 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Breath hydrogen and methane: poor indicators of apparent digestion of soy fiber

EA McNamara, MD Levitt and JL Slavin

To examine whether end-alveolar breath hydrogen and methane could be used as indicators of fiber digestion in humans, 16 male subjects were fed four fiber-free, complete liquid diets with 0, 30 g (heat processed), 30 g, and 60 g/day soy polysaccharide. Breath hydrogen was measured hourly and breath methane every 4 h on days 6 and 8 of each study period. Feces were collected, homogenized, dried, and analyzed for neutral detergent fiber (NDF). NDF in diets was determined and apparent NDF digestibility calculated. NDF from soy was extensively fermented, greater than 80%, on the fiber-containing diets. No significant relationship was found between breath-gas excretion and fiber digestion, although breath-gas values varied greatly. Breath hydrogen and methane were not significantly different when subjects consumed diets containing 0, 30, or 60 g soy polysaccharide.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
S.A. Kapadia, A. H. Raimundo, G.K. Grimble, P. Aimer, and D.B.A. Silk
Influence of Three Different Fiber-Supplemented Enteral Diets on Bowel Function and Short-Chain Fatty Acid Production
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, January 1, 1995; 19(1): 63 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
S. B. Fredstrom, J. W. Lampe, H.-J. G. Jung, and J. L. Slavin
Apparent Fiber Digestibility and Fecal Short-Chain Fatty Acid Concentrations With Ingestion of Two Types of Dietary Fiber
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, January 1, 1994; 18(1): 14 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
J. W. Lampe, M. E. Effertz, J. L. Larson, and J. L. Slavin
Gastrointestinal Effects of Modified Guar Gum and Soy Polysaccharide as Part of an Enteral Formula Diet
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, November 1, 1992; 16(6): 538 - 544.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
B. H. Liebl, M. H. Fischer, S. C. Van Calcar, and J. A. Marlett
Dietary Fiber and Long-Term Large Bowel Response in Enterally Nourished Nonambulatory Profoundly Retarded Youth
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, July 1, 1990; 14(4): 371 - 375.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by The American Society for Nutrition