AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, P. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, P. J.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 44, 291-298, Copyright © 1986 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Validation of doubly labeled water for measuring energy expenditure during parenteral nutrition

DA Schoeller, RF Kushner and PJ Jones

The doubly labeled water method was compared with intake-balance for measuring energy expenditure in five patients receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Because parenteral solutions were isotopically different from local water, patients had to be placed on TPN at least 10 days before the metabolic period. Approximately 0.1 g 2H2O and 0.25 g H2(18)O per kg total body water were given orally. We collected saliva before, 3 h, and 4 h after the dose for measurement of total body water and urine before, 1 day, and 14 days after the dose for measurement of isotope eliminations. On day 14, total body weight was remeasured and change in body energy stores was calculated, assuming constant hydration. Intake was assessed from weights of TPN fluids plus dietary record for any oral intake. Energy expenditure from doubly labeled water (+/- SD) averaged 3 +/- 6% greater than intake- balance. Doubly labeled water method is a noninvasive, nonrestrictive method for measuring energy expenditure in patients receiving TPN.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. M. Harris, L. M. Lanningham-Foster, S. K. McCrady, and J. A. Levine
Nonexercise movement in elderly compared with young people
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2007; 292(4): E1207 - E1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M.-M. G. Wilson and J. E. Morley
Invited Review: Aging and energy balance
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2003; 95(4): 1728 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
M. B. E. Livingstone and A. E. Black
Markers of the Validity of Reported Energy Intake
J. Nutr., March 1, 2003; 133(3): 895S - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. J. Gretebeck, D. A. Schoeller, R. A. Socki, J. Davis-Street, E. K. Gibson, L. O. Schulz, and H. W. Lane
Adaptation of the doubly labeled water method for subjects consuming isotopically enriched water
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 1997; 82(2): 563 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by The American Society for Nutrition