AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kendall, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kendall, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, G. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kendall, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, G. R.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 45, 625-637, Copyright © 1987 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

A comparison of nutrient-based and exchange-group methods of diet instruction for patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes

PA Kendall, CM Jansen, DD Sjogren and GR Jansen

This study compared effectiveness of nutrient-based (Diet Guide) vs food-group (Exchange Lists) methods of diabetic diet evaluation in improving dietary compliance, glycemic control, and biochemical indicators of heart disease risk. Eighty-three persons with noninsulin- dependent diabetes were taught one of two diet-planning methods in a 3- session workshop. Both methods led to reductions in energy intake and percent of calories from fat and saturated fatty acids in 6 mo postworkshop. Reductions in fat intake were greater and more long lasting for persons using Diet Guide than using Exchange Lists method of diet planning. Despite dietary changes, neither diet-planning method led to significant decreases in weight or skinfold thickness. Few differences were seen in clinical measurements pre- and 6 mo postworkshop. Total and LDL cholesterol values were lower than preworkshop values for men in both groups. Suggestions are given for improving effectiveness of both diet-planning methods.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
K. O. Lacey, D. A. Chyun, and M. Grey
An Integrative Literature Review of Cardiac Risk Factor Management in Diabetes Education Interventions
The Diabetes Educator, September 1, 2000; 26(5): 812 - 820.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by The American Society for Nutrition