AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poehlman, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Badylak, S. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poehlman, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Badylak, S. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Poehlman, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Badylak, S. F.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 47, 793-798, Copyright © 1988 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Resting metabolic rate and postprandial thermogenesis in highly trained and untrained males

ET Poehlman, CL Melby and SF Badylak
Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington 05405.

The purpose was to compare the resting metabolic rate (RMR) and thermic effect of a meal (TEM) in exercise trained and untrained individuals. TEM was measured for 180 min and blood samples were drawn for determination of plasma insulin, glucose, triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4). Results indicated that highly trained subjects demonstrated a higher RMR when expressed in kilocalories per minute and per kilogram fat-free weight (FFW) than do untrained subjects. TEM was lower in trained (55.8 +/- 3.1 kcal) than in untrained (79.2 +/- 3.7 kcal) subjects. No differences were noted between the two groups for plasma levels of insulin, glucose, T3, and T4. A higher RMR and lower TEM persisted in the trained group compared with the untrained group when groups were matched for FFW and body fat. Results support a higher RMR in endurance athletes and a lower TEM even after control is exerted over differences in body composition.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by The American Society for Nutrition