AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J. H.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 48, 144-147, Copyright © 1988 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Influence of stress, depletion, and/or malignant disease on the responsiveness of surgical patients to total parenteral nutrition

JH Shaw
University Department of Surgery, Auckland Hospital, New Zealand.

We performed a series of 14C[urea] infusions to assess the effect of depletion (greater than 15% decrease in body weight), stress (VO2 greater than 130 mumol.kg-1.min-1), and cancer on the basal rate of net protein catabolism (NPC) and the response of patients to total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Depleted patients had low rates of NPC (0.8 +/- 0.1 g.kg-1.d-1) compared with nondepleted patients (p less than 0.05) and during TPN anabolism was achieved (0.5 +/- 0.2 g.kg-1.d-1). Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients had rates of NPC similar to those of normal volunteers; during TPN, NPC approximated zero. Severely stressed (SS) nondepleted patients had high rates of NPC (2.7 +/- 0.2 g.k-1.d-1) whereas SS-depleted patients had lower (p less than 0.05) rates of NPC (1.9 +/- 0.3 g.kg-1.d-1); both groups of SS patients remained catabolic despite TPN (1.2 +/- 0.3 and 0.5 +/- 0.2 g.kg-1.d-1, respectively). In response to TPN, depleted patients become anabolic, GI cancer patients stop losing protein but do not become anabolic, and stressed patients remain catabolic and continue to loss protein.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L J. Hoffer
Protein and energy provision in critical illness
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2003; 78(5): 906 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by The American Society for Nutrition