AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sarwar, G.
Right arrow Articles by Botting, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sarwar, G.
Right arrow Articles by Botting, H. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sarwar, G.
Right arrow Articles by Botting, H. G.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 49, 806-813, Copyright © 1989 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Differences in protein digestibility and quality of liquid concentrate and powder forms of milk-based infant formulas fed to rats

G Sarwar, RW Peace and HG Botting
Health and Welfare Canada, Health Protection Branch, Banting Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario.

Protein and amino acid digestibility and protein quality of liquid concentrate and/or powder forms of infant formulas were studied by rat balance and growth methods. Casein plus methionine (control) and eight formulas were fed to weanling rats as the sole source of protein in diets containing 8% protein (nitrogen X 6.25). Values for true digestibility of protein, lysine, methionine, or cystine (85-92%) in liquid concentrates were up to 13% lower than those in powders. Similarly, the 2-wk relative protein-efficiency ratio values (64-85%) or the relative net protein ratio values (78-94%) of liquid concentrates were up to 25% lower than those for powders. Lower levels of bioavailable lysine and methionine plus cystine in liquid concentrates compared with powders (prepared by the same manufacturer) would suggest that inferior protein quality of liquid concentrates may be due to more heat treatment involved in their preparation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by The American Society for Nutrition