AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bursztein, S.
Right arrow Articles by Elwyn, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bursztein, S.
Right arrow Articles by Elwyn, D. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bursztein, S.
Right arrow Articles by Elwyn, D. H.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 50, 227-230, Copyright © 1989 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

A mathematical analysis of indirect calorimetry measurements in acutely ill patients

S Bursztein, P Saphar, P Singer and DH Elwyn
Department of General Intensive Care, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.

Beside indirect calorimetry is generally accepted as reliable for evaluating energy expenditure (EE) and oxidation of carbohydrate (dCH) and fat (dF) in critically ill patients. Daily measurement of nitrogen excretion is usually included in the calculation of EE, dCH, and dF but it is difficult to perform in the clinical setting and is not necessary for accurate determination of EE. In this paper new equations, which are suitable for use with critically ill patients, are given for calculating EE, dCH, and dF without N-excretion measurements. With these equations the maximum errors for EE, dCH, and dF were 56, 179, and 306 kcal/d, respectively. The mean errors in 38 measurements of 26 critically ill patients were 27, 86, and 143 kcal/d, respectively. Measurement of EE by these equations is very accurate and suitable for both research and clinical use. Although the calculation of dCH and dF is much less precise, it can still given an indication of fuel utilization.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
J. A. Hoher, P. J. Z. Teixeira, F. Hertz, and J. da S. Moreira
A Comparison Between Ventilation Modes: How Does Activity Level Affect Energy Expenditure Estimates?
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, March 1, 2008; 32(2): 176 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
H. A. Haugen, L.-N. Chan, and F. Li
Indirect Calorimetry: A Practical Guide for Clinicians
Nutr Clin Pract, August 1, 2007; 22(4): 377 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
N. Zijlstra, S. M. t. Dam, P. J. M. Hulshof, C. Ram, G. Hiemstra, and N. M. de Roos
24-Hour Indirect Calorimetry in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients
Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 2007; 22(2): 250 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by The American Society for Nutrition