American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 52, 591-595, Copyright © 1990 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Validity of surface anthropometry to estimate upper-arm muscularity, including changes with body mass loss

FI Katch and T Hortobagyi
Department of Exercise Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003.

The differences among fatfold thicknesses, girths, and muscle plus bone cross-sectional area (M+B CSA) were examined at three sites along the upper arm (distal, mid, and proximal) by using surface anthropometry (study 1, n = 40) and x ray (study 2, n = 53). Changes in anthropometry and x ray were also evaluated in nine obese patients who reduced body mass by less than or equal to 20.5 kg over 32 wk. Weight reduction resulted in nonproportional changes at the three sites, including significant differences in M+B CSA. Thus, it would not be valid to consider the arm as a geometric cylinder. Although a one-time assessment of upper arm M+B CSA with surface anthropometry may be valid at any of the three sites, changes in M+B CSA measured at any site may result in an under- or overestimation of actual changes in M+B CSA.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. R Boye, T. Dimitriou, F. Manz, E. Schoenau, C. Neu, S. Wudy, and T. Remer Anthropometric assessment of muscularity during growth: estimating fat-free mass with 2 skinfold-thickness measurements is superior to measuring midupper arm muscle area in healthy prepubertal children Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2002; 76(3): 628 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Miyatani, H. Kanehisa, Y. Masuo, M. Ito, and T. Fukunaga Validity of estimating limb muscle volume by bioelectrical impedance J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2001; 91(1): 386 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]