AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mangels, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Veillon, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mangels, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Veillon, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mangels, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Veillon, C.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 52, 621-627, Copyright © 1990 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Selenium utilization during human lactation by use of stable-isotope tracers

AR Mangels, PB Moser-Veillon, KY Patterson and C Veillon
Department of Human Nutrition and Food Systems, University of Maryland, College Park 20742.

We examined utilization of selenomethionine (SeMet) and selenite in six lactating (L) and six nonlactating (NL) women, 2-3 mo postpartum, and seven never-pregnant (NP) women by use of stable-isotope tracers. All groups had similar selenium status at the start of the study. Significantly more selenium from SeMet than from selenite was absorbed and appeared in plasma in all groups. Milk contained more selenium from apparently absorbed SeMet than from selenite. More selenium from apparently absorbed selenite than from SeMet appeared in urine of NP and NL subjects whereas L subjects had approximately the same amount of selenium from apparently absorbed selenite and SeMet in their urine. All groups retained significantly more selenium from SeMet than from selenite; L women retained more selenium from selenite than did the other two groups. Absorption and retention of selenium from SeMet in L women did not appear to be significantly different from that in other women, suggesting that selenium requirements during lactation are increased mainly because of milk losses.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. F. Burk, B. K. Norsworthy, K. E. Hill, A. K. Motley, and D. W. Byrne
Effects of chemical form of selenium on plasma biomarkers in a high-dose human supplementation trial.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2006; 15(4): 804 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
P. B. Moser-Veillon, A. R. Mangels, N. E. Vieira, A. L. Yergey, K. Y. Patterson, A. D. Hill, and C. Veillon
Calcium Fractional Absorption and Metabolism Assessed Using Stable Isotopes Differ between Postpartum and Never Pregnant Women
J. Nutr., September 1, 2001; 131(9): 2295 - 2299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
K. Y. Patterson and C. Veillon
Stable Isotopes of Minerals as Metabolic Tracers in Human Nutrition Research
Experimental Biology and Medicine, April 1, 2001; 226(4): 271 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by The American Society for Nutrition