AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffer, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffer, L. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Clark, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffer, L. J.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 53, 21-26, Copyright © 1991 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Reappraisal of the resting metabolic rate of normal young men

HD Clark and LJ Hoffer
McGill Nutrition and Food Science Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

The Harris-Benedict (HB) equation, widely used to estimate the resting metabolic rate (RMR), has been disputed by Owen et al who reported that it overestimates the RMR of men aged less than 50 y by approximately 9%. We measured the RMR of 29 healthy, nonsmoking men aged 18-33 y by direct oxygen consumption with a closed-circuit technique similar to that used by Harris and Benedict (respirometer), as well as by a ventilated-hood technique. RMR determined by the ventilated-hood technique was 5.6% lower than when determined by the respirometer (1643 +/- 148 vs 1721 +/- 145 kcal/d, respectively, means +/- SD; P less than 0.001). RMRs by both these methods were lower than the value of 1813 +/- 164 kcal/d predicted by the HB equation; the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for RMR were 92.4-98.1% (respirometer) and 88.5-91.1% (ventilated hood) of the value predicted by the HB equation. The 95% CI for RMR determined by ventilated hood was 98.4-103.5% of the value predicted by using a new equation proposed by Owen et al. We conclude that the HB equation overestimates RMR by 9.2% in normal young men. This could be due in part to the inherent discomfort experienced by subjects when the original technique was used.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. J Muller, A. Bosy-Westphal, S. Klaus, G. Kreymann, P. M Luhrmann, M. Neuhauser-Berthold, R. Noack, K. M Pirke, P. Platte, O. Selberg, et al.
World Health Organization equations have shortcomings for predicting resting energy expenditure in persons from a modern, affluent population: generation of a new reference standard from a retrospective analysis of a German database of resting energy expenditure
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2004; 80(5): 1379 - 1390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L J. Hoffer
Protein and energy provision in critical illness
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2003; 78(5): 906 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Boivin, A. Camirand, F. Carli, L. J. Hoffer, and J. E. Silva
Uncoupling Protein-2 and -3 Messenger Ribonucleic Acids in Adipose Tissue and Skeletal Muscle of Healthy Males: Variability, Factors Affecting Expression, and Relation to Measures of Metabolic Rate
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2000; 85(5): 1975 - 1983.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. Al-Adsani, L. J. Hoffer, and J. E. Silva
Resting Energy Expenditure is Sensitive to Small Dose Changes in Patients on Chronic Thyroid Hormone Replacement
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 1997; 82(4): 1118 - 1125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by The American Society for Nutrition