AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston & Online Sept 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlundt, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlundt, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schlundt, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, D.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 53, 1151-1158, Copyright © 1991 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

A behavioral taxonomy of obese female participants in a weight-loss program

DG Schlundt, D Taylor, JO Hill, T Sbrocco, J Pope-Cordle, T Kasser and D Arnold
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240.

To create a behavioral classification of obesity, 2-wk baseline food diaries were obtained from 236 obese women entering weight-loss programs. Subjects monitored food intake along with the social, environmental, and emotional context in which each meal occurred. Variables representing situation-specific eating behaviors were statistically extracted from greater than 11,000 eating episodes. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified five distinct groups of subjects on the basis of similarity of eating patterns. The five groups were (1) moderately healthy eating habits, (2) chronic food restrictors, (3) alternating diet-binge eaters, (4) emotional overeaters, (5) unrestricted meal overeaters. The five groups differed on questionnaire measures of emotional adjustment and eating behavior but did not differ on dropout rates, amount of weight lost, or exercise compliance. The chronic food restrictors had significantly less lean body mass, lower resting metabolic rates, and higher waist-to-hip ratios than did the unrestricted meal overeaters.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
C. Braet, L. Claus, L. Goossens, E. Moens, L. Van Vlierberghe, and B. Soetens
Differences in Eating Style between Overweight and Normal-Weight Youngsters
J Health Psychol, September 1, 2008; 13(6): 733 - 743.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 West J Nurs ResHome page
G. M. Timmerman
Caloric Intake Patterns of Nonpurge Binge-Eating Women
West J Nurs Res, February 1, 1998; 20(1): 103 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Diabetes EducatorHome page
D. G. Schlundt, J. W. Pichert, M. R. Rea, W. Puryear, M. L.I. Penha, and S. S. Kline
Situational Obstacles to Adherence for Adolescents with Diabetes
The Diabetes Educator, January 1, 1994; 20(3): 207 - 211.
[PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by The American Society for Nutrition