AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrett-Connor, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barrett-Connor, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Barrett-Connor, E.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 54, 182S-187S, Copyright © 1991 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


REVIEW ARTICLES

Nutrition epidemiology: how do we know what they ate?

E Barrett-Connor
Department of Community and Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0607.

It is generally believed but difficult to prove that diet plays a role in the risk of various diseases. This paper reviews strengths and deficiencies of select diet-assessment methods used in epidemiologic studies with particular reference to their use in the study of osteoporosis. Direct observation or weighed food records are useful primarily as validation for less intrusive methods. Complete food history by interview or food diary (by self report) is expensive and time consuming. A 24-h diet recall obtained by a trained dietitian can provide accurate, quantitative information on recent intake but does not represent usual intake. Food frequency questionnaires provide better estimates of usual diet but are less quantitative and subject to problems of recall and seasonality. No method is universally the best. Lack of an expected diet-disease association may reflect exposure misclassification, inadequate statistical power, or limited range of the nutrients studied. Given the differences in diet-assessment methods, studies of dietary calcium and osteoporotic fracture have had surprisingly similar results.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. Jahns, A. Carriquiry, L. Arab, T. A. Mroz, and B. M. Popkin
Within- and Between-Person Variation in Nutrient Intakes of Russian and U.S. Children Differs by Sex and Age
J. Nutr., November 1, 2004; 134(11): 3114 - 3120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
B. Shatenstein, H. Payette, S. Nadon, and K. Gray-Donald
An Approach for Evaluating Lifelong Intakes of Functional Foods in Elderly People
J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2384 - 2391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. M. Arpadi, P. A. Cuff, D. P. Kotler, J. Wang, M. Bamji, M. Lange, R. N. Pierson, and D. E. Matthews
Growth Velocity, Fat-Free Mass and Energy Intake Are Inversely Related to Viral Load in HIV-Infected Children
J. Nutr., October 1, 2000; 130(10): 2498 - 2502.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by The American Society for Nutrition