AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tai, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pi-Sunyer, F. X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tai, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pi-Sunyer, F. X.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tai, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pi-Sunyer, F. X.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 54, 783-787, Copyright © 1991 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Meal size and frequency: effect on the thermic effect of food

MM Tai, P Castillo and FX Pi-Sunyer
Obesity Research Center, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University, New York, NY.

The effects of meal size and frequency on thermic effect of food (TEF) were examined in seven healthy normal-weight young women. Each volunteer consumed in random order one of two identical meals [3138 kJ (750 kcal), 54.5% carbohydrate, 14.0% protein, 31.5% fat]. One meal was taken over 10 min [large meal (LM)] whereas the other was taken in six equal portions of 523 kJ (125 kcal) at 30-min intervals over a 3-h period [small meals (SM)]. Metabolic rate was measured for 1 h before and every 30 min after the meal started for 5 h. When expressed as either kJ/min (kcal/min) or kJ/5h (kcal/5h), TEF was significantly higher in the LM day than in the SM day (P less than 0.05). We conclude that the temporal pattern in which a mixed caloric load is eaten affects the thermogenic response and may be an important determinant of energy balance after a meal.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
H. R Farshchi, M. A Taylor, and I. A Macdonald
Beneficial metabolic effects of regular meal frequency on dietary thermogenesis, insulin sensitivity, and fasting lipid profiles in healthy obese women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 16 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. J. Jenkins, C. W. Kendall, L. S. Augustin, S. Franceschi, M. Hamidi, A. Marchie, A. L Jenkins, and M. Axelsen
Glycemic index: overview of implications in health and disease
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2002; 76(1): 266S - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. H. Forslund, A. E. El-Khoury, R. M. Olsson, A. M. Sjodin, L. Hambraeus, and V. R. Young
Effect of protein intake and physical activity on 24-h pattern and rate of macronutrient utilization
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 1999; 276(5): E964 - E976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by The American Society for Nutrition