AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarasuk, V.
Right arrow Articles by Beaton, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tarasuk, V.
Right arrow Articles by Beaton, G. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tarasuk, V.
Right arrow Articles by Beaton, G. H.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 55, 22-27, Copyright © 1992 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Statistical estimation of dietary parameters: implications of patterns in within-subject variation--a case study of sampling strategies

V Tarasuk and GH Beaton
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Patterns within intraindividual variation in energy intake were described previously. Using case studies based on the same Beltsville One-Year Dietary Intake Study data set, we examined the interaction between random and nonrandom variation and the choice of sampling strategy in estimation of individuals' usual intakes over 1 y. Mean intake estimates derived from adjacent-day samples were less reliable and more likely to be biased than were those based on randomly selected days. A finite adjacent-day sample fails to encompass longer-term trends. Because adjacent-day samples underestimate true within-subject variation, by customary tests they appear more reliable. This may present an interpretational problem. Comparisons of random weekend and week-day samples confirm that failure to proportionately sample both will bias the estimation of the usual (1-y mean) intake and the within- subject variance.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. Pannacciulli, A. D Salbe, E. Ortega, C. A Venti, C. Bogardus, and J. Krakoff
The 24-h carbohydrate oxidation rate in a human respiratory chamber predicts ad libitum food intake
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 625 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
X. Ponce, E. Ramirez, and H. Delisle
A More Diversified Diet among Mexican Men May Also Be More Atherogenic
J. Nutr., November 1, 2006; 136(11): 2921 - 2927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Periwal and C. C. Chow
Patterns in food intake correlate with body mass index
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2006; 291(5): E929 - E936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. Nyambose, K. G. Koski, and K. L. Tucker
High Intra/Interindividual Variance Ratios for Energy and Nutrient Intakes of Pregnant Women in Rural Malawi Show That Many Days Are Required to Estimate Usual Intake
J. Nutr., June 1, 2002; 132(6): 1313 - 1318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
V. Persson, A. Winkvist, T. Ninuk, S. Hartini, T. Greiner, M. Hakimi, and H. Stenlund
Variability in Nutrient Intakes among Pregnant Women in Indonesia: Implications for the Design of Epidemiological Studies Using the 24-h Recall Method
J. Nutr., February 1, 2001; 131(2): 325 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
T. M.S. Wolever, S. Hamad, J.-L. Chiasson, R. G. Josse, L. A. Leiter, N. W. Rodger, S. A. Ross, and E. A. Ryan
Day-to-Day Consistency in Amount and Source of Carbohydrate Intake Associated with Improved Blood Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 1999; 18(3): 242 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by The American Society for Nutrition