AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berke, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Poehlman, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berke, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Poehlman, E. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Berke, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Poehlman, E. T.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 55, 626-629, Copyright © 1992 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Resting metabolic rate and the influence of the pretesting environment

EM Berke, AW Gardner, MI Goran and ET Poehlman
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington 05405.

We examined the effect of pretesting environment on measurement of resting metabolic rate (RMR). RMR was measured in 18 older (66.1 +/- 1.4 y) individuals after an overnight stay in the Clinical Research Center (ie, inpatient) and after subjects transported themselves to the laboratory (ie, outpatient). Similar measurements were also performed after an 8-wk endurance-training program. RMR was higher (P less than 0.01) before exercise training in subjects who transported themselves to the laboratory (ie, outpatients; 4.9 +/- 0.13 kJ/min) than in inpatients (4.6 +/- 0.13 kJ/min) and after exercise training in outpatients (5.4 +/- 0.08 kJ/min) vs inpatients (5.0 +/- 0.13 kJ/min). Training increased RMR under both inpatient (10%; P less than 0.01) and outpatient (11%; P less than 0.01) conditions. We conclude that RMR is higher when measured under outpatient conditions in older volunteers. Therefore, when daily energy requirements based on the assessment of RMR are being estimated, the pretesting environment should be considered. However, the exercise-training-induced increase in RMR can be detected by using either an inpatient or an outpatient protocol.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. E Hise, D. K Sullivan, D. J Jacobsen, S. L Johnson, and J. E Donnelly
Validation of energy intake measurements determined from observer-recorded food records and recall methods compared with the doubly labeled water method in overweight and obese individuals
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2002; 75(2): 263 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. I. Goran
Measurement Issues Related to Studies of Childhood Obesity: Assessment of Body Composition, Body Fat Distribution, Physical Activity, and Food Intake
Pediatrics, March 1, 1998; 101(3): 505 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. A. Smith, J. Dollman, R. T. Withers, M. Brinkman, J. P. Keeves, and D. G. Clark
Relationship between maximum aerobic power and resting metabolic rate in young adult women
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 1997; 82(1): 156 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by The American Society for Nutrition