AJCN 19th International Congress of Nutrition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caputo, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mattes, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caputo, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mattes, R. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Caputo, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mattes, R. D.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 56, 36-43, Copyright © 1992 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Human dietary responses to covert manipulations of energy, fat, and carbohydrate in a midday meal

FA Caputo and RD Mattes
Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308.

Dietary responses to dilution or supplementation of the energy value and macronutrient content of foods are poorly characterized in humans. After a 1-wk baseline, 16 free-living, normal-weight adults were provided midday meals systematically varying in energy, fat, and carbohydrate contents for 5-d periods. Their compensatory free-feeding intake was monitored through diet records. In response to energy dilution by carbohydrate or fat, mean daily energy intake was 88% and 97% of baseline, respectively. Responses to the energy surfeit led to intakes 104% and 116% of baseline, respectively. However, the absolute magnitude of the carbohydrate supplement challenge was small. Adjustments of macronutrient-specific intake during the high- carbohydrate, low-carbohydrate, high-fat, and low-fat meal periods were 134%, 91%, 165%, and 95% of baseline, respectively. Although these group findings indicate that defense against covert dilution of the energy, fat, or carbohydrate contents of a meal is stronger than that to supplementation, individual responses were highly variable.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. E Leahy, L. L Birch, and B. J Rolls
Reducing the energy density of multiple meals decreases the energy intake of preschool-age children
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2008; 88(6): 1459 - 1468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. H. Lichtenstein and L. Van Horn
Very Low Fat Diets
Circulation, September 1, 1998; 98(9): 935 - 939.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by The American Society for Nutrition