AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reid, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ames, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reid, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ames, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Reid, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ames, R.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 56, 463-466, Copyright © 1992 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Relationships between upper-arm anthropometry and soft-tissue composition in postmenopausal women

IR Reid, MC Evans and R Ames
Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

The value of upper-arm anthropometry as a measure of lean- and fat- tissue masses in 140 normal postmenopausal white women was assessed by studying the relationships of these measures to total and regional fat, and lean masses measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Midarm circumference (MAC) was highly correlated with total and regional fat masses (r = 0.85-0.89, P less than 0.0001) but less so with lean-tissue masses (r = 0.26-0.34). Triceps-skinfold thickness was also correlated with fat masses (r = 0.70-0.74, P less than 0.0001) but not with lean mass (r = 0.02-0.09). The derived index, arm muscle area (AMA), was less closely correlated with fat mass than was MAC (r = 0.59-0.61), but its correlation with lean-tissue mass was comparable to that for MAC (r = 0.37-0.43). Multiple-regression analysis confirmed that the anthropometric indices were more closely correlated with fat than with lean mass. It is concluded that all these indices are useful measures of fat mass but that none, including AMA, is a specific index of lean- tissue mass in normal postmenopausal women.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. D. Stookey, L. Adair, J. Stevens, and B. M. Popkin
Patterns of Long-Term Change in Body Composition Are Associated with Diet, Activity, Income and Urban Residence among Older Adults in China
J. Nutr., September 1, 2001; 131(9): 2433S - 2440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by The American Society for Nutrition