AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pierson, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pierson, R. N., Jr
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pierson, R. N.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 56, 963-967, Copyright © 1992 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Body-fat measurement in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: which method should be used?

J Wang, DP Kotler, M Russell, S Burastero, M Mazariegos, J Thornton, FA Dilmanian and RN Pierson Jr
Department of Medicine, St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025.

Malnutrition is common in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), which distorts the chemical contents in the fat-free mass (FFM) and alters the assumptions underlying the traditional methods for calculating body-fat content so that such measurements may not be accurate. In vivo neutron-activation analysis (IVNA) measures FFM independently of the traditional assumptions, thereby providing more accurate measurements of body fat. We compared seven methods for measuring body fat in 18 male patients with AIDS: IVNA, total body water (TBW by 3H2O dilution), total body potassium (TBK by 40K counting), dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and two well-calibrated anthropometric methods. FatTBW and fatDPA were not significantly different from fatIVNA. FatTBW gave the highest correlation with fatIVNA and the smallest SEE of +/- 1.8% (1.1 kg). The traditional and widely available TBW and the newer DPA method provide reliable estimates of fatIVNA in patients with AIDS.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Schwenk, A. Beisenherz, G. Kremer, V. Diehl, B. Salzberger, and G. Fatkenheuer
Bioelectrical impedance analysis in HIV-infected patients treated with triple antiretroviral treatment
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 1999; 70(5): 867 - 873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by The American Society for Nutrition