AJCN EB Program 2010 Early Registration
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burger, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Habicht, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burger, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Habicht, J. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Burger, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Habicht, J. P.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 57, 295S-302S, Copyright © 1993 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

REVIEW ARTICLES

Testing the effects of nutrient deficiencies on behavioral performance

SE Burger, JD Haas and JP Habicht
Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

The association between specific nutrient deficiencies and poor performance on behavioral tests has been documented for several nutrients. The determination of causality, however, remains elusive. This paper presents the essential criteria for a valid test of causality. Findings from experimental studies in which a nutritional treatment was randomly allocated can be summarized in a statistical statement about the probability that the nutrient treatment caused the behavioral response. Criteria for assessing the internal validity of these studies are examined in terms of whether alleviation of a nutrient deficiency did or did not produce a detectable behavioral response. The plausibility of such a causal inference is dependent on its congruency with known or theorized biological and behavioral mechanisms. External validity describes the extent to which inferences from internally valid studies may be applicable to other populations or circumstances. In addition to these scientific considerations, some of the ethical issues of nutrient-treatment trials are also discussed. All of these considerations provide a better basis for judging whether public health action would be worthwhile than do observed associations that could actually be due to other causes.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 NEJMHome page
N. S. Harris, P. B. Crawford, Y. Yangzom, L. Pinzo, P. Gyaltsen, and M. Hudes
Nutritional and Health Status of Tibetan Children Living at High Altitudes
N. Engl. J. Med., February 1, 2001; 344(5): 341 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by The American Society for Nutrition