AJCN 19th International Congress of Nutrition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muir, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by O'Dea, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muir, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by O'Dea, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Muir, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by O'Dea, K.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 57, 540-546, Copyright © 1993 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Validation of an in vitro assay for predicting the amount of starch that escapes digestion in the small intestine of humans

JG Muir and K O'Dea
Department of Human Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

The aim of the present study was to validate an in vitro assay for quantifying resistant starch (RS) in foods against an in vivo model. The amount of starch escaping digestion in the small intestine of ileostomates was compared with that observed by using the in vitro assay. Subjects with ileostomies were fed five foods containing different types and amounts of RS (baked beans, pearl barley, cornflakes, and whole and ground rice). The total amount of starch escaping digestion and recovered in the effluent (ranging from 5.7% in baked beans to 0.7% in ground rice) was compared with results obtained by using the in vitro assay with an incubation time of 6 h. The assay was found to be a good qualitative predictor (r = 0.90, P < 0.05), but a poor quantitative predictor of RS amounts. Increasing the duration of incubation with alpha-amylase and amyloglucosidase to 15 h resulted in a very close agreement between results from the in vitro technique and the in vivo model. These data indicate that for a variety of foods the in vitro assay produced an excellent estimate of starch escaping digestion in the small intestine of humans.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. Gajda, E. A. Flickinger, C. M. Grieshop, L. L. Bauer, N. R. Merchen, and G. C. Fahey Jr.
Corn hybrid affects in vitro and in vivo measures of nutrient digestibility in dogs
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2005; 83(1): 160 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. G Muir, E. G. Yeow, J. Keogh, C. Pizzey, A. R Bird, K. Sharpe, K. O'Dea, and F. A Macrae
Combining wheat bran with resistant starch has more beneficial effects on fecal indexes than does wheat bran alone
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2004; 79(6): 1020 - 1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. L. Bauer, M. R. Murphy, B. W. Wolf, and G. C. Fahey Jr
Estimates of Starch Digestion in the Rat Small Intestine Differ from Those Obtained Using In Vitro Time-Sensitive Starch Fractionation Assays
J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2256 - 2261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
B. W. Wolf, K. A. Garleb, Y. S. Choe, P. M. Humphrey, and K. C. Maki
Pullulan Is a Slowly Digested Carbohydrate in Humans
J. Nutr., April 1, 2003; 133(4): 1051 - 1055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
G. E. Bednar, A. R. Patil, S. M. Murray, C. M. Grieshop, N. R. Merchen, and G. C. Fahey Jr.
Starch and Fiber Fractions in Selected Food and Feed Ingredients Affect Their Small Intestinal Digestibility and Fermentability and Their Large Bowel Fermentability In Vitro in a Canine Model
J. Nutr., February 1, 2001; 131(2): 276 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. J Vonk, R. E Hagedoorn, R. de Graaff, H. Elzinga, S. Tabak, Y.-X. Yang, and F. Stellaard
Digestion of so-called resistant starch sources in the human small intestine
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2000; 72(2): 432 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
M J A P Govers, N J Gannon, F R Dunshea, P R Gibson, and J G Muir
Wheat bran affects the site of fermentation of resistant starch and luminal indexes related to colon cancer risk: a study in pigs
Gut, December 1, 1999; 45(6): 840 - 847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
A. K. E. Åkerberg, H. G. M. Liljeberg, Y. E. Granfeldt, A. W. Drews, and I. M. E. Björck
An In Vitro Method, Based on Chewing, To Predict Resistant Starch Content in Foods Allows Parallel Determination of Potentially Available Starch and Dietary Fiber
J. Nutr., March 1, 1998; 128(3): 651 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by The American Society for Nutrition